Greetings from the Cloud!
Sheet Forming Simulations using Crystal Plasticity Finite Elements Methods Crystal plasticity simulation study on the influence of texture on earing in steel This is an example of a numerical study on the influence of crystallographic texture on the earing behavior of a low carbon steel during cup drawing.
The simulations are conducted by using the texture component crystal plasticity finite element method using the free texture simulation software package DAMASK which accounts for the full elastic-plastic anisotropy of the material and for the explicit incorporation of crystallographic texture including texture evolution and texture update.
Several important texture components that typically occur in commercial steel sheets were selected for the study. By assigning different spherical scatter widths to them the resulting ear profiles were calculated under consideration of texture evolution.
The study reveals that 8, 6, or 4 ears can evolve during cup drawing depending on the starting texture. An increasing number of ears reduces the absolute ear height. The effect of the orientation scatter width texture sharpness on the sharpness of the ear profiles was also studied.
It was observed that an increase in the orientation scatter of certain texture components entails a drop in ear sharpness while for others the effect is opposite. It is a characteristic phenomenon associated with the crystallographic texture and the resulting elastic-plastic anisotropy of metals.
Sheet steels usually have pronounced textures which they inherit from the preceding processing steps such as hot rolling, cold rolling, and heat treatment. What is a yield surface in crystal plasticity?
A yield surface describes a typically five-dimensional entity of stress states which are together referred to as 'surface' in the six-dimensional space of the stress tensor at which irreversal elastic-plastic deformation occurs. It is for this general phenomenological concept irrelevant which kind of material is described.
Any stress state inside of the yield surface entails elastic deformation only.
However, Hotelling doesn’t get you to economic growth with finite resources – production is still decreasing over time, and tends asymptotically to zero – it’s just that there is no collapse and oil is distributed over time such that there are no gains in net present value to be achieved by shifting production forward or back in time. Various concepts exist to introduce texture-related sheet anisotropy into finite element models for sheet forming. The initial material anisotropy existing before sheet deformation can be incorporated either through an anisotropic yield surface function or directly via the incorporation of crystallographic texture models into the finite element codes. The goals of the new build system are: Make it easy to reuse code and resources; Make it easy to create several variants of an application, either for multi-apk distribution or for different flavors of an application.
When a stress state is reached that lies exatly on the yield surface the material has reached its yield point and the material starts to deform plastically.
No stress state above the yield surface can exist. When the stress is increased further than the material's internal resistance to plastic flow must also grow, which is referred to as strain hardening or work hardening. Thus, further deformation of the material causes the stress state to remain on the growing yield surface, even though the shape and size of the surface may change as the plastic deformation evolves for instance due to the gradual evolution of the crystallographic texture what you to changes in the topological arrangement of the different constituents and phases.
Which types of yield surface description methods exist in crystal plasticity? Various concepts exist to introduce texture-related sheet anisotropy into finite element models for sheet forming. The initial material anisotropy existing before sheet deformation can be incorporated either through an anisotropic yield surface function or directly via the incorporation of crystallographic texture models into the finite element codes.
The anisotropic yield surface models can be classified into two groups. The first one comprises empirical and phenomenological anisotropic yield surface equations, such as the equations of Hill from andHosford, Barlat, or Barlat and Lian to name but a few important ones.
These yield surface functions are formulated as convex higher-order polynoms, i. The physical nature of anisotropy can be incorporated into these concepts for instance by fitting the corresponding polynomial coefficients with the aid of texture-based strain-rate or self-consistent homogenization methods or with anisotropy parameters obtained from mechanical tests.
The second type of yield surface models is directly formulated as texture-based yield loci the coefficients of which can be directly expressed in terms of the texture-based mechanical models in conjunction with experimentally determined orientation distributions. The advantage of yield surface concepts for mechanical anisotropy predictions are relatively short calculation times, when implemented into finite element models, although one must recall that the measurement of the mechanical anisotropy parameters and the fitting of the anisotropy coefficients must be added to the total time required for a prediction.
The main disadvantage of the yield surface concept is that they do not consider that the inherited sheet starting textures may evolve further in the course of sheet forming. This means that reliable anisotropy simulations should incorporate the starting texture as well the gradual update of that texture during deep drawing operations.
Some recent results indeed indicate that the change in crystallographic texture during deep drawing may be relevant for the resulting ear shapes. How is crystallographic texture evolution considered in crystal plasticity - based yield surface mechanics?
In order to take into account texture evolution during deformation, the crystallographic texture models have been developed.6 Note: 1. Dimension “D” to suit customer flange specification. 2. Other dimensions and part description, refer model AV-WP (Fig.1) and table 1.
6 Note: 1. Dimension “D” to suit customer flange specification.
2. Other dimensions and part description, refer model AV-WP (Fig.1) and table 1. However, Hotelling doesn’t get you to economic growth with finite resources – production is still decreasing over time, and tends asymptotically to zero – it’s just that there is no collapse and oil is distributed over time such that there are no gains in net present value to be achieved by shifting production forward or back in time.
Systems Simulation: The Shortest Route to Applications. This site features information about discrete event system modeling and simulation.
It includes discussions on descriptive simulation modeling, programming commands, techniques for sensitivity estimation, optimization and goal-seeking by simulation, and what-if analysis.
FEMs are widely used in education, research, and industries. What is the prospect of having a vibrant community to evolve an open-source finite element code? In the field of numerical analysis, meshfree methods are those that do not require connection between nodes of the simulation domain, i.e.
a mesh, but are rather based on interaction of each node with all its lausannecongress2018.com a consequence, original extensive properties such as mass or kinetic energy are no longer assigned to mesh elements but rather to the single nodes.