Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet Book he authored in advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population Forced abortions.
A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens. The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States?
In a book Holdren co-authored inthe man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that: That must be an exaggeration or a hoax.
No one in their right mind would say such things. Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof.
Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscienceco-authored in by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed.
But that article, although it contained many shocking quotes from John Holdren, failed to make much of an impact on public opinion. In the modern era, it seems, journalists have lost all credibility, and so are presumed to be lying or exaggerating unless solid evidence is offered to back up the claims.
Well, this report contains that evidence. Of course, Holdren wrote these Abortion should be encouraged essay in the framework of a book he co-authored about what he imagined at the time late s was an apocalyptic crisis facing mankind: He felt extreme measures would be required to combat an extreme problem.
Whether or not you think this provides him a valid "excuse" for having descended into a totalitarian fantasy is up to you: Totalitarian regimes and unhinged people almost always have what seems internally like a reasonable justification for actions which to the outside world seem incomprehensible.
On the left in each case is a scanned image taken directly from the pages of the book itself; on the right is an exact transcription of each passage, with noteworthy sections highlighted. Below each quote is a short analysis by me.
Following these short quotes, I take a "step back" and provide the full extended passages from which each of the shorter quotes were excerpted, to provide the full context. And at the bottom of this report, I provide untouched scans and photos of the full pages from which all of these passages were taken, to quash any doubts anyone might have that these are absolutely real, and to forestall any claims that the quotes were taken "out of context.
And prepare to be shocked. Compulsory abortions would be legal Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.
As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren "hides behind the passive voice" in this passage, by saying "it has been concluded.
Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone.
If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone.
It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.
Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis. Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily.
This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name.
I think that abortion should not be illegal. But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice -- to force women to have abortions. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will.
And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself regardless of my views may find particularly immoral or traumatic.
Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems.
No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: Putting sterilants in the water supply?
While you correctly surmise that this suggestion "seems to horrify people more than most proposals," you apparently are not among those people it horrifies.
Because in your extensive list of problems with this possible scheme, there is no mention whatsoever of any ethical concerns or moral issues.An analytic examination of the flawed, and the important, arguments on both sides of the abortion debate.
Aristotle: Politics. In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle ( B.C.E.) describes the happy life intended for man by nature as one lived in accordance with virtue, and, in his Politics, he describes the role that politics and the political community must play in bringing about the virtuous life in the citizenry.
The Politics also provides analysis of the kinds of political community that. Should low income families be encouraged to use abortion?Dear IshikaM: I am fascinated by your essay Persuasive Essay on Abortion because it is a really important topic and people should try to spread awareness like you lausannecongress2018.comon is the taking of a human life, and this shouldnt be encouraged.
Perhaps the largest point of contention involving terminology is the label applied to what or who is being aborted.
Those who think abortion should be generally . Yahoo Lifestyle is your source for style, beauty, and wellness, including health, inspiring stories, and the latest fashion trends.
Post-Abortion Healing. If you or someone you know is suffering after abortion, confidential non-judgmental help is available: Call Project Rachel's national toll-free number: HOPE() or visit lausannecongress2018.com Spanish-speakers may visit lausannecongress2018.com